• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Login
  • Register
Publishers Lunch logo Publishers Lunch logo
  • Publishers Marketplace
  • Site Guide
  • Help
Login Sign Up
  • Personnel
  • AI
  • Compensation
  • Unions
  • Book Bans
  • New Releases
  • Earnings
  • The Trial
  • Archives
Publishers Lunch logo
  • Publishers Marketplace
  • Site Guide
  • Help
  • Publishers Marketplace
  • Site Guide
  • Help

August 3, 2009By Michael Cader

Library Groups Endorse Google Settlement; Ask DOJ to Join Court In Monitoring Implementation

August 3, 2009By Michael Cader

The American Library Association (ALA), the Association of College and Research Libraries, and the Association of Research Libraries have reiterated their basic support for the proposed Google Books settlement, while also repeating concerns that the settlement live up to its promises in balancing market pricing and broad access when selling institutional subscriptions. (They note that “The likely demand among academic libraries for an institutional subscription is high.”)

In a letter to the Department of Justice’s anti-trust division–following meetings with them as part of their investigation–the associations write “we believe that the Division itself should take a proactive role in the implementation of the settlement…. The Division should treat the settlement, if approved, as a consent decree to an antitrust action it brought. It should monitor the parties’ compliance with the settlement’s provisions as it would monitor the conduct of parties under an antitrust consent decree, and it should request the court to take action when it concludes that the parties have not met their obligations under the settlement.”

They also suggest that DOJ ask “the court to review any refusal by the Registry to license copyrights on books on the same terms available to Google. Finally, if necessary, the Division should ask the court to review the procedures by which the Registry selects members to its board of directors, and to evaluate whether the Registry properly considers the interest of all rightsholders in its decision-making.”
Release and letter

Filed Under: eNews, Free

sidebar

Primary Free Sidebar

Login

Forgot Password Quick Pass User Login
Get Full Access
The Publishing Industry’s Essential Daily Read

Each Publishers Lunch Deluxe subscription includes full access to our searchable multi-year archive of industry news, a nightly email reporting 10 to 50 deal transactions, and our database of industry contacts, scripts, and posting privileges.

Learn More

RSS Automat

  • Namwali Serpell Objects to College Board Using Her Work Without Permission On AP Test May 21, 2025 Twitter post
  • PRH Takes Over Distro for Boom Studios, Titles No Longer Available to Libraries via Comics Plus May 20, 2025 Bleeding Cool
  • UK's House of Lords Continues to Block House of Commons From Handing Over IP to AI Companies May 20, 2025 BBC
  • Noxious Texas Bill Criminalizing Bookselling Appears Dead for This Term May 20, 2025 KERA
  • Many Adidas Shareholders Want A New Chair, But Bertelsmann Chief Thomas Rabe Gets Another Year May 16, 2025 Fashion United
  • Connecticut House Approves Unconstitutional Bill that Would Lead Publishers to Stop Licensing eBooks to Libraries There May 16, 2025 CT Mirror
  • Amazon Cuts 100 Jobs in the Devices and Services Unit (Which Includes Kindle Readers) May 15, 2025 Reuters
  • Rushdie Withdraws As Claremont McKenna Graduation Speaker After Muslim Students Object May 15, 2025 LA Daily News
  • Spotify Connects Music to 33 1/3 Audiobooks May 13, 2025 Spotify
  • In Soft Art Market, Riggio Collection Garners $272 Million at Christie's, Below Estimates May 13, 2025 NYT
Publishers Marketplace logo

Contact Us

News

  • Publishers Marketplace
  • Report News
  • Discuss
  • Classifieds
  • Rights Offerings

Deals

  • Report A Deal

Books

  • Buzz Books

Jobs

  • Job Board
  • Privacy Policy Terms of Use